Sunday, September 29, 2013

Professional development | Navitas English (Australia ELICOS)


learners play Stop The Bus!

narrative

Filling in for another teacher I decided to arrive early enough to go over materials, sketch out a plan, and introduce myself to staff before class.

The school has two levels of quite large classrooms – in my experience – plenty of resources and libraries, interactive whiteboards, and computers in every room. Staff were friendly and I enjoyed overhearing some interesting ELT-speak going on behind me while I planned as other staff discussed their students and classes. Having been away to Argentina for almost 4 years, it was great to be there amongst teachers, and I could see how well organised the office was.

As a warm-up or rapport building task I had planned a mingle activity (alphabet soup; learners arrange themselves alphabetically by asking questions) and teacher story. And so, learners mingled making questions about where they had been last on holidays. After this we sat in a horseshoe seating arrangement – I'd hoped everyone might have arrived to class by this time – where learners listened to a story about my last holiday at Iguazú Falls.

I chose to do this, one to build rapport, but also because the page of the course-book I was handed featured these exact waterfalls, which I had visited. Voted one of the New Seven Wonders of Nature in 2011, and one of the most visited sights in South America, I thought it would go down well, particularly with the Brazilian leaners.  

During my story each of four missing learners showed up, one by one, the last of whom at the end of my story.

Adhering to school policy, as they arrived, I asked the late arrivals to wait downstairs until half-past. The last arrived at exactly half-past, so I asked her to go down to collect the others. 

Those who heard the complete story seemed interested, making questions afterwards, and it cropped up again several times during the lesson.

After some gist reading about an Iguazú Falls tour guide we went on to elicit verb patterns, key language from their previous lesson. After completing a few exercises from the course-book, I asked learners to recall their own last holidays, and to write down example sentences using the verb patterns Verbs were, for example, I love..., I advise..., I hate..., I'd like..., and at this stage I was using a test-teach-test pattern to assess their ability of it. 

After a little clarifying on the board, by marking two columns, 'verb + infinitive' and 'verb + gerund', and eliciting the verbs into each, learners went on to correct their mistakes. Leaners shared stories with partners while I listened for persistent errors. Leaners swapped roles.  

For the second half of the evening we practised giving directions – I'd probed them on directions to anywhere they might have mentioned by chance earlier in the evening, to also get a sense of their ability.

In conjunction with a listening learners marked out points on a map of Iguazú Falls in their books. Peer checking answers before listening again. We then looked at a transcript of the listening and learners underlined all directions evident in the text. In pairs they then wrote these directions below illustrations in their books. I gave each of them a location in the school to keep secret by writing it in their notebooks. They then thought of directions to this location and wrote them down carefully. Taking turns, learners listened to their partner's directions and tried to follow them, in order to discover their mystery location in the building. The class seemed to be enjoying itself, a little guidance here and there.

Finishing the class we played Stop The Bus, a game in which learners must elicit from their team target language from the lesson using any method they wished, short of uttering that actual TL. The first to reach a certain number wins and should shout 'stop the bus'.


observation

The learners who had been with me from the beginning of class responded better than those who hadn't, attention going intermittently towards their smart-phones throughout the lesson.

I'm not sure whether this was a response to my having asked them to wait downstairs. Indeed, not having been at the warm-up stage they were less engaged, and warmed-up!

I understand the policy if it encourages punctuality by having learners, should they be running late, to still adhere to some kind of schedule. Sort of like a second chance at being on-time, though they'll miss arguably the most important lesson stage, at least they're encouraged to be punctual. If they arrive within that 30 minutes they must wait it out. The obvious question is will learners take advantage of this and always arrive 30 minutes late? Of course, any later than half past the hour means they miss the lesson. There are great advantages to classroom management with this rule.

key moment

When the learners returned from their last break I gave them three options for how to carry on with the lesson: watching a course unit video, doing some interactive more task-based activity, or completing course-book exercises. They had already seemed tired on arrival, and I didn't want to burn them out, therefore choosing their own task, I think works well. 

The task-based activities they chose were: giving each other directions in a 'total physical response' activity, and Stop The Bus, which both worked well. The course-book exercises I suggested for homework as a good way to consolidate the lesson points, especially as they were to be tested on some  next lesson.

Thursday, August 01, 2013

Printer-less worksheet making.

The printer is broken: no fear, pen and paper will do just in time.







Commentary

Tuesday, July 30, 2013

Professional Development | Accenture In-Company Lessons

                                            


Accenture in-company lessons



REPORTS – JULY








Monday, July 29, 2013

Friday, July 19, 2013

Professional Development | Baufest In-Company Lessons


                                                                Baufest in-company lessons


                                                                 lesson plan here and here






Great class today! beginning with a warm-up discussion on football, oil companies, and subtitled media. 

We started by correcting a letter containing spelling mistakes in pairs

No sooner had all learners arrived I listed 18 of the mistakes on the board and eliciting correct spelling rules which they produced with the aid of some photocopies of rules I had placed at their table. Learners said they had been exposed to British spellings in school, US through subtitled television and they used a mix. They said spelling might depend on whom one is writing to.

Following this we moved to the main-aim task of the day: vocabulary for ways of speaking (e.g. whisper, mumble, shriek). Learners used dictionaries to look up meaning, pronunciation, and example sentences. I watched as they made up examples speaking, writing, and shared information in groups — I didn't see anyone making notes on pronunciation though. Afterwards I drilled a few words containing longer, more difficult vowel sounds, which also served to prepare them and to segue into the next task: Stop The Bus.

Learners elicited the new vocabulary and their teams guessed the words correctly, writing them on the board. 

The team writing all words first  (A)  shouted 'stop the bus,' and the exercise was over. Some quick feedback and it was already 10 o'clock.

Outside the classroom learners collected individual homework tasks, which all aim at consolidate language covered during the course.







Sunday, July 14, 2013

when might may not be may

commentary

As sometimes I need to clarify when to use modal verbs 'may' and 'might', and as they are both so often interchangeable, I today discovered some examples of when it is usually

may rather than might, e.g. the planet Venus may be seen clearly in the night sky during this month | The seeds from the plant may grow up to 20 centimetres in length | Exceeding the quoted dose may cause drowsiness – i.e., for academic language to talk about the characteristics or behaviour of something,

and

might rather than may, is sometimes used to talk about what was typically the case in the past, e.g. During the war, the police might arrest you for criticising the king | Years ago children might be sent down the mines at the age of six | In the early 19th century a person might be sent to Australia for stealing as little as a loaf of bread,

in all of which examples 'may' and 'might' are not usually interchangeable.

We can use might or may for a possible situation, e.g. I may go to Ireland | I might go to Ireland, but only might when the situation is not real. For example, If I were Tom's parents, I might look for a better job – you are not in Tom's position, you will not look for a better job.

Other, more everyday examples include: 

may I leave now? | May I help you? | you may not leave now – for permission

might they go by bus? (or could) – for possibility in the interrogative form (may they would imply permission), rather formal.

Historically, 'might' is the past form of 'may', but that fact doesn't offer any help in clarifying any current day usage of these two modal verbs. *I do, however, tell my students to change 'may' to 'might' when using reported speech (I may move to Sydney = he said he might move to Sydney).

Wednesday, July 10, 2013

Professional Development | Baufest In-Company Lessons


                                                                Baufest in-company lessons


                                                                 lesson plan here and here



REPORTS – JULY




 


Friday, July 05, 2013

Saturday, June 29, 2013

Professional Development | AMEX In-Company Lessons

  


AMEX in-company lessons

lesson plans here here here here and here


REPORTS – MAY-JUNE












Wednesday, May 29, 2013

Monday, May 27, 2013

Do we need theory? (OUP Webinar, 2013)

Commentary commentary 

I have found ELT theory useful. I can understand why I am doing something in a particular stage of a lesson in a particular way and I try to understanding what transpired or why.

I think, in turn, it also helps in giving feedback. 

Historically, owing to a cultural move away from formal approaches to ELT, with the success in the 70s of discovering a variety of somewhat effective communicative approaches, since then attention towards and enthusiasm for 'theory' has fallen to make way for such aELT 'revolution'. However, it is still important. 

On the other side of the coin, I understand the effects of too much focus on theory, losing a little common sense when the thinking about why I do something may momentarily preclude my observation of it (and recognition of potentially key evidence). A general feeling for things may be lost when focussed on what I should be doing at a certain time in class. 

A lesson's spontaneity may be stifled by over-planning. This versus the shortcomings of not having planned anything is known as the 'planing paradox'.

Something I gained from Oxford University Press webinars — which I take almost every month —  regarding theory was to think of a classroom as a constellation of individuals with very specific individual needs; it was explained too much focus is on general guidelines and theories and principles, gleaned from textbooks or taught in teacher training, that capture general truths in ELT (and pedagogy). This, to me, sheds some light  on a disconnect between theory and practice I work with — it’s not possible for a reading activity to run perfectly if the TL clarification of key vocabulary stage is interrupted (by so many everyday occurrences, e.g., lateness, classroom overexcited settling down, classroom too tired, persistent questions difficult to control, and more).

It is often better to consider each class unique, the learners, the settings, any variables, and it might be better in the reading activity example to quickly cut down the task. 

Routine reflection by the teacher based on specific goings-on in a unique classroom, COMBINED with the teacher's own theories as to why something happens, should inform practices. Links  should be made between these reflections and the evidence in the classroom. Any theory that rests solely on a priori, i.e. theory that comes from reasoning, intuition, or revelation, from textbooks or the like, should be shelved and referenced. 

Textbooks and literature help get one cogitating and fire up the imagination, but once read through, the classroom itself is then the best textbook. 

The webinar disambiguated 'theory' for me in three ways: firstly, theory in its very powerful 'Einstein' shape and form, which is very general, abstract, and difficult to explain – string-theory, for example. Secondly, a principle-based 'Bach' theory, which again aims at capturing very general truths, but aims more at telling us what should be constructed and what should happen as a result (music composition as in the case of Bach). This is the reason for which we don't do things at random — it is this last type, it stated, that the ELT world focussed on too heavily. And finally, there is the theory that we use to account for a situation or justify a course of action, which is much more specific, particular, and connected to the everyday-world, which it described as an 'Agatha Christie' (or Sherlock Holmes) type theory (e.g., ‘the explanation is that the thief got in through the open window, and that's why you were burgled').

‘Who needs theory? — We all do!’ (OUP Webinar, 2013)

It is an important function of theory formation to advance from 'naïve' and unreflecting 'realism' to a more conscious understanding of the principles and concepts underlying one's actions.

– Stern, 1983 
 
Without theory, experience has no meaning. 
Without theory, one has no questions to ask. 
Hence without theory, there is no learning.

– William Edwards Deming

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

Professional Development | AMEX In-Company Lessons

 


AMEX in-company lessons




This is your place for extra materials, entertainment, to ask questions related to English, and to leave comments, at any time!







Stop in for a coffee, to review, and to practise!

SKILLS | Listening

 

SKILLS | Reading

 There's a good article on page 48 of your coursebook; complete the questions and we may discuss it in class!

SKILLS | Writing

  
describing / drawing the AMEX shares graphs with cards




SKILLS | Speaking

/ə/ = about, common, standard, international, America


        /ə/
humour = you

/ekw/     /ə/
acquaintance = day

/ki:n/
keen = beach, sheet, me

  

LANGUAGE | Vocabulary


acquaintance
step-mother
keen (enthusiastic)
abroad
overseas
belongings
belong
lyrics
lighthouse 

 

LANGUAGE | Grammar

Find examples of grammar on page 17 of your coursebook (and exercises on page 18) 

 

LANGUAGE | Functions

How many questions can you make in one minute with:

how, who, which, where, what, when, did, does, do, have, has, whom, whose, how long, how old, how far, how many, how much, how tall, why?

Great, now try again, but only using either past, present, or future tense.